twitter




Saturday, November 7, 2009

Would you prefer a fancy snail mail invitation to a formal annual dinner or a fancy email invite?

I prefer snail mail..i like getting stuff in the mail.





Which one do you think is more appropriate?
Would you prefer a fancy snail mail invitation to a formal annual dinner or a fancy email invite?
Always snail mail for formal invitations. Email invites are only for less casual events, such as bachelorette parties, casual dinners or bowling trips.
Reply:If it's formal, definitely prefer to receive it snail mail... plus who doesn't like getting mail? (that's not junk for once!)...


E-vite is fine too... it's quick and doesn't stand a chance getting lost in transit.
Reply:More "appropriate", snail . . .





But I personally wouldn't care or take offense from something like that. I would just be happy to be invited . . .
Reply:Formal functions ALWAYS require formal invitations. Just because the world has e-mail, doesn't mean it has replaced polite society.
Reply:Email because I check it at least 3 times a day! My parents do regular mail.





Still, snail mail is more appropriate and formal.





VIVA LA RAZA!
Reply:Proper etiquette for a formal event would involve sending a formal invitation in the mail.



Reply:Formal event should be a mailed invitation. Evites are for informal events.
Reply:Annual dinner for a business company? Email will do.
Reply:Formal annual dinner deserves a fancy snail mail invite!
Reply:Definately postal mail.





Plus they might want a keepsake if it's a special dinner.
Reply:Snail mail. It's so much more classy. Not everyone reads their emails everyday.
Reply:I like snail mail, because I love getting mail from the postal mail.
Reply:formal invitations are a waste of money


email is fine and you can call the others that don't reply
Reply:formal event = formal invitation (regular mail)
Reply:snail mail
naming

No comments:

Post a Comment